Aerodynamic and Hydrodynamic Performance
design for Powerboats

Performance Boat design and setup secrets for Recreational tunnels, Offshore Cats, Racing tunnels, Fishing/Utility hulls, Vee and Vee-Pad Hulls, Bass Boats
Home     New     About Us     Technical Articles      TBPNews Archives     FREE Downloads     Research     Contact Us
Testimonials      Reviews      Join TBPNews       Advertise       Search       Buy Now          

AR© develops advanced Aerodynamic techniques for highly accurate Lift, Drag, Stability components for Tunnel hull performance optimization.
Get complete article by email request:   Share:
    BREAKTHROUGH!


Figure 1 - Complex fluid flow modeling specifically for tunnel and vee hulls allows accurate computer modeling of these complex designs that fly in air and on water.



Figure 2 - Forces acting on performance powerboats must include the interaction of aerodynamic lifting surfaces and hydrodynamic forces.


Figure 3 - Aerofoil Edge Vorticies.


Figure 4 - Air flow over a tunnel hull deck surface can be smooth, efficient.


Figure 5 - Symmetrical/Asymmetrical catamaran hull forms



Figure 6 - Sponsons on a tunnel boat provide ‘wing-tip-ends’  similar to lift-enhancing ‘winglets’ on efficient commercial aircraft


Figure 7 - Some designs have 'wing' operating at higher angle of attack , 'aero angle' (αaero) compared to hull 'trim angle' (αtrim).
 


Advanced aerodynamic analysis technique gives highly accurate lift and drag contributions to tunnel boat performance predictions & optimization.

Aerodynamic research has been advanced by AeroMarine Research®, extending traditional aerodynamic algorithms to account for the complexities of 'ground proximity', 'end-limited pressure' conditions (tunnel sides), non-symetrical upper/lower aerofoil surfaces.  AR® has developed unique algorithms to establish highly accurate aerodynamc lift, drag and dynamic stability results that are specific to tunnel hull, power catamaran, vee hull and vee-pad hulls. 

AR conducted unique aerodynamic research that included wind tunnel assessments, ground effect experiments, and complex hydrodynamic research, all of which greatly advanced the understanding of the intricacies of tunnel hull behavior. Ground-effect tests were conducted in a high-speed, sub-sonic, wind tunnel using an image-wing (reflection) method. [The image-wing technique uses an identical model mounted inverted with respect to the test model in flow stream, and correlates well with results of a body moving over a surface.]

Tunnel boats demonstrate exceptional performance because they have a 'wing' or aerofoil built-in to their design.  The tunnel “roof” and the upper deck surface form the lower and upper surfaces of the aerofoil, respectively.  When properly designed, it is this aerofoil, and the aerodynamic lift it generates, that gives the tunnel boat its great performance. A performance tunnel boat must count on the sponsons for some of the lift for the hull, just as a deep-vee boat must depend on its narrow running surface to support its weight.  The tunnel hull (and many vee hulls) has the additional advantage of being able to further reduce the water drag by supplying lift from its aerodynamic surfaces.

Aerodynamic Lift
A properly designed tunnel hull can be considered as a wing in 'ground effect', (even though it's water that it is 'flying' over).  Every pound of lift that can be generated by this 'wing', is one less pound of lift that doesn't have to be supplied by the hydrodynamic lifting surfaces ‑ which bring unwanted water drag.  Many inter-dependance factors are involved in creating the lift generated by the tunnel and the deck surfaces, or this 'wing'.  This consideration is the same for all sizes, configurations, weights, speeds, power of tunnel boats and catamarans.  The main contributors can be summarized as:
a) Airspeed
b) Angle-of-attack
c) Effective aerodynamic Lifting Area
d) Aspect Ratio of Tunnel (chord/width)
e) Height above the water surface
f) Aerofoil shape of tunnel cross-section
g) Aerofoil thickness
h) Surface condition of exposed areas

[TBDP©/VBDP© performs for all hull types, all sizes, all powers, all speeds.]

Complex fluid flow modeling specifically for tunnel and vee hulls allows accurate computer modeling of these complex designs that fly in air and on water.  

Important Considerations
Forces acting on a tunnel hull must include the influence complex planing surfaces (steps, lifting strakes, centre-pad/pod surfaces, etc.), and of non-planing forces (aerodynamic contributions from low aspect ratio ground effect hull forms, etc.).

While the normalized derivation for lift from hydrodynamic surfaces is...
   LA = ˝ ρA • V2 SA • CLA
   where:
   L
A = hydrodynamic (water) lift
   ρ
A = density of water
   V   = velocity
   S
A = effective wetted surface area
   CL
A= lift coefficient

An advantage of tunnel hull designs is the entrapment feature of the lower aerofoil surface or 'tunnel' section, through the 'end-plate' provided by outboard sponsons.  Normally higher aspect ratio wings tend to increase net lift because mainly, of the reduced opportunity for the 'escape' of high pressure air around the 'wing tips' to the upper surface.  This 'escape' of air causes what is called a 'wing-tip vortex', reducing lift and increasing drag.  The outboard sponsons on each side of the tunnel section, act as 'wing end plates' that restrict this 'escape' of airflow, enhancing aerodynamic performance.  

The establishment of effective surfaces and related CLA is necessarily complex. The above influencing variables are changing constantly with hull velocity, making the accurate accomodation very complex.  What's more, each of these variables are interdependant (on each other), so the accurate analysis of  CLA, total Lift and total Drag is tricky.

Aerodynamic Drag
The total drag created by the hull must be overcome by the available thrust - namely the engine/propeller.  The drag of a tunnel hull is made up of both aerodynamic or 'air' drag (drag from the tunnel/deck surfaces, appendage air drags such as driver, cockpit area, motor, etc.) and hydrodynamic or 'water drag' (from the planing sponsons and motor appendages under water). 

As with tunnel lift, the air drag increases primarily with the square of the velocity and as angle-of-attack increases. 

This air drag originates in three (3) forms:
a) Skin Friction
b) Induced Drag
c) Profile Drag

Also, the aerodynamic lift/drag is strongly influenced by the complex interdependence of hydrodynamic Lift/Drag and other appendage drags (cockpit aero drag, cavity drag, engine lower unit drag, etc.) - all affecting CLA, SA and LA of aerodynamic lifting surfaces. 

[The analysis methods in 'Secrets of Tunnel Boat Design' (ISBN# 1-894933-30-3) and AeroMarine Research TBDP©/VBDP© software demonstrate the development of proven algorithms that solve all of these challenges accurately.]

Sponson Sides Enhance Aero Lift
A wing derives its lift by the difference between a high pressure on the underside of the wing compared to a lower pressure on the topside. This difference in pressure results in an upward force. Some airplanes attain improved lift by adding ‘wing-tip-ends’ or ‘winglets’ that prevent airflow from escaping around the end of the wing, causing ‘wing tip vortices’ and reduced lift/drag efficiency. 

An advantage of tunnel hull designs is the entrapment feature of the lower aerofoil surface or 'tunnel' section, through the ‘built-in’ wing-tip ends formed by the sponsons on either side of the tunnel section.  This significantly increases the efficiency of tunnel lift with more lift and less drag

Trim Angle vs Aero Angle
Some tunnel boats are designed so that the 'wing' portion of the hull will operate at an incrementally higher angle of attack (aero angle, αaero) compared to the hull 'trim angle' (αtrim).  This feature is quite common in many tunnel hulls and power catamaran designs, particularly weight and power sensitive setups.  The αaero feature is easily identifiable by observing the tunnel height at the bow of the boat at a higher dimension than the height of tunnel at the transom.  The higher angle of the 'wing' hull section allows for better seaworthy behavior in heavier waves and also achieves more aerodynamic lift.  So, when the hull trim angle (αtrim) is say, 3°, the 'wing' experiences a local angle of attack (αaero) of 5°. This feature generates higher aerodynamic Lift (and also higher Drag), and is often more beneficial to overall performance.

Dynamic Stability
When one of the many influencing forces change, the aerodynamic lift/drags and WAngle (trim angle) and dynamic stability are systematically affected.  The analysis to balance these inter-dependent forces throughout velocity range is complex, and is key to accurate performance prediction. 

The AeroMarine Research TBDP©/VBDP© software doesn't use any 'C' constants, 'shape coefficients' or 'speed factors' to simulate different hull types, shapes or velocity/size ranges. - it analyzes all design and dimensional aspects of each hull from first engineering principles, proven by research and full-scale testing.  [This is a unique feature of TBDP©/VBDP©, as most all other performance analysis software products rely on choosing 'fudge-factors' to adjust results to expected hull types! TBDP©/VBDP© software gets the right answer based on pure hull design. No fudge factors are required. ]

TBDP©/VBDP© software uses Finite Element analysis techniques to accurately calculate the many affecting hydrodynamic factors that are constantly changing and highly influence each other. The power of these techniques and the software allows for comprehensive analysis, employing engineering techniques that include the critical inter-dependence of aerodynamic, hydrodynamic and stability calculation methods that are key to proper Tunnel hull design and accurate performance prediction.

Russell's development of Advanced aerodynamic techniques were proven through wind tunnel testing, water channel testing and full scale hull verification testing.  

How it Works
Any performance hull will perform better when taking best advantage of 'aerodynamic' lift.  Any amount of 'aero lift' will improve a boats performance − even a seemingly small amount.  

If we compare 2 boats each weighing 1500 pounds, that means 1500 pounds of total lift must be generated by the hull.  At say, 50 mph, the first boat with no aerodynamic lift capability requires all of its lift to be supplied from an area of wetted planing surface.  If the second boat can contribute (even only) 100 pounds of aerodynamic lift (that's only 6% of the total lift required) then only 1400 pounds of water-lift remain to be generated, which requires less wetted surface area and a corresponding reduction in hydrodynamic (water) drag. 

Less drag means more efficiency and better performance.  In this case, the reduced wetted surface of the second boat results in a 9% reduction in water drag − just like gaining 10 to 15 hp and much improved fuel economy, or an additional 5 mph!

The performance effects of all design and setup features that influence aerodynamic lifts, drags and dynamic stabiltiy for all Vee hull, Vee-pad hull, tunnel hull and modified-tunnel hull types of powerboat applications is developed by Russell. The results are highly accurate representations of aerodynamic forces and inter-dependence with hydrodynamic forces associated with all powerboat configurations, using Russell's analysis techniques in the "Tunnel Boat Design Program" and "Vee Boat Design Program" software.

Russell applies these advancements in newest versions of AR's TBDP©/VBDP© performance analysis software.


Research results now included in performance analysis by TBDP©/VBDP©

[
more about AR's research     More about AR's publications    and    Technical articles/papers]
 

jim2.jpg (37035 bytes)
about Jim Russell

13th edition
"Secrets of Tunnel Boat Design" book
secrets_of_tunnel_boat_desi.gif (53x73 -- 21190 bytes)
 "Secrets of Propeller Design" book!

"TBDP Version 8" Software                     "VBDP Version 8" Software                      "PropWorks2" software


Order with your Shopping Cart
Special pricing updated September 03, 2024
Contact us at:
AeroMarine Research®
67 Highland Crescent, Cambridge, ON, Canada, N1S1M1
Tel: 519-240-7959

©Copyright by AeroMarine Research and Jim Russell, 1999, all rights reserved.
Material from this website may be not copied or used or redistributed, in whole or in part, without specific written consent of Jim Russell or AeroMarine Research®.